Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2005, p. 14967-14970, Vol. 79, No. 23
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.23.14967-14970.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
National Center for Macromolecular Imaging, Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030,1 MRC Virology Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland G11 5JR, United Kingdom2
Received 27 August 2005/ Accepted 12 September 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Potential links between the eukaryote-infecting Herpesviridae and the prokaryote-infecting Caudovirales have been suggested previously because of parallels in their capsid assembly pathways and similarities between their portal complexes, through which DNA enters the capsid (2, 16). While only one bacteriophage portal structure has been determined by X-ray crystallography (15), the distinctive 12-fold arrangement of subunits has been reported for several other bacteriophages and also one herpesvirus (17). However, the overall appearance of herpesvirus particles is very different from that of the Caudovirales and sequence comparison has not provided any evidence for common origins in either capsid shell or portal proteins. To investigate whether evidence for potential relationships could be detected at the protein structural level, we compared the capsid structure of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) with those of four bacteriophages, P22,
29, T4, and HK97, all members of the Caudovirales (7, 13, 14, 19) (Fig. 1). The crystal structure of the HK97 capsid (19) shows that the capsid protein is roughly triangular (Fig. 1A) and contains a fold not found in any other protein in the SCOP database (http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/). This signature fold consists of three
-helices and two ß-sheets. The sub-nanometer-resolution cryoelectron microscopy (cryoEM) structures of P22 (13) (Fig. 1B and C) and
29 (14) particles and the X-ray crystal structure of gp24, the T4 pentavalent capsid protein (8) (Fig. 1D), established that the capsid proteins of these bacteriophages follow the same fold design despite having disparate sequences (<15% identity).
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. A gallery of bacteriophage capsid protein structures determined by either X-ray crystallography or cryoEM. HK97 gp5 (A), mature P22 gp5 (B), procapsid P22 gp5 (C), and T4 gp24 (D) are shown in comparison to HSV-1 VP5 (E). VP5, the 145-kDa capsid protein, was segmented from an approximately 8-Å cryoEM map of the HSV-1 capsid. The red line demarcates the boundary between the floor domain and the other two domains of VP5 (upper and middle domains). The N-terminal helix in P22 that has been proposed to undergo refolding is indicated by the arrow in panel C.
|
-helix centroids with <2.5-Å root mean square deviation (Fig. 2c) and by the close match in the locations of the ß-sheets. Additionally, the relative orientations and molecular interfaces of the subunits are retained, with the
-helices and ß-sheets from the three subunits giving rise to a common architecture at the three-fold axes in the floors of HK97 and HSV-1 (Fig. 2d and e). Thus, the exhibited fold can be considered a structural signature for these viruses, which is analogous to the well-known ß-sandwich fold of many RNA virus particles (9) or the double ß-barrel of some DNA virus capsids (1).
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Match of the secondary structure elements of HSV-1 capsid VP5 and HK97 phage gp5 and their molecular interactions in the capsids. (a) The isolated VP5 floor domain, in blue, viewed from outside the capsid. SSEhunter identified two long -helices (red; 1 and 2) adjacent to a large ß-sheet (yellow; ß1) in the floor domain, as well as a second ß-sheet (yellow; ß2) and several smaller helices flanking 1 and 2. (b) The HK97 capsid protein (gp5) shown in the same view reveals a similar structural motif. A simulated density map for gp5 at approximately 8-Å resolution is shown in pale blue. (c) Alignment of the secondary structure elements by use of Foldhunter (12) demonstrated a clear match between the floor domain of VP5 and the core structure of gp5. (d) Arrangement of gp5 subunits around a local three-fold axis ( ) in the HK97 capsid as viewed from inside the capsid. (e) Organization of the HSV-1 capsid floor as shown in the same view in panel d. Individual VP5 subunit floor domains are demarcated with the long -helices ( 1, 2) and associated ß-sheets (ß1, ß2) annotated in one subunit.
|
-helix and refolding of another
-helix, resulting in capsid expansion by over 100 Å in external diameter (13). The similar dispositions of secondary structural elements in P22 and HSV-1 raise the possibility that an equivalent rotation produces the changes in the floor domain seen during HSV-1 maturation. Since the signature capsid protein fold has been found in all of the sufficiently well-studied capsids that undergo reconfiguration, it is likely that its development was an important factor in meeting the potentially conflicting demands imposed by the need to maintain capsid stability while allowing for conformational changes associated with virus maturation. The observation that herpesviruses and tailed bacteriophages are related through their capsid protein structures triggers the need for a re-evaluation of evolutionary evidence from sequence comparisons. The divergence between the evolutionarily distant fish, mollusk, and mammalian herpesviruses is so great that their common ancestry cannot be deduced from sequence similarity (4, 6). The best candidate for a protein that is specific to herpesviruses is a packaging protein, the putative terminase encoded by HSV-1 gene UL15. In the past it has not been considered diagnostic for Herpesviridae, as it is distantly related to an equivalent function identified in certain Caudovirales (5). However, in light of the evolutionary link demonstrated through their capsid protein folds, we can now interpret the occurrence of related packaging proteins as independent evidence for common ancestry of these two viral lineages.
The arrangement of subunit proteins in the portal and the characteristic folds of the capsid proteins are sufficiently distinctive to suggest that each evolved only once. Both are fundamental components of the capsid structure, which represents one of the defining features of any virus. When considered together with the retained homology in the terminase protein, they provide a compelling molecular evidence-based argument in support of a common origin for the particle-packaging complex in the Caudovirales and Herpesviridae. This linkage between the most abundant set of bacteriophages and a major family of eukaryotic viruses highlights the growing evidence of relationships across these major biological divides. In light of this and other recent studies (1, 3), it is becoming increasingly plausible that extant viruses may have arisen from a relatively small number of primordial progenitors.
It is not clear whether the existence of related viruses infecting cells from different domains of life reflects the presence of a common ancestor that predates the separation of the domains or is a result of later adaptation to a new host cell. Superficially, the strategy adopted by incoming herpesvirus capsids to target and release DNA into eukaryotic nuclei appears analogous to that employed by tailed bacteriophages to infect bacterial cells. Although this resemblance may be coincidental, it is conceivable that if eukaryotic cells are the products of symbiosis, as has been postulated, it actually reflects the retention of an ancient pathway of infection. In this case, the common ancestor of the Caudovirales and Herpesviridae would predate the incorporation of the prokaryotic derived nucleus into the eukaryotic cell.
Research has been supported by the National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation and by the UK Medical Research Council and the UK-Texas Bioscience Initiative of the Department of Trade and Industry.
|
|
|---|
29. Mol. Cell 18:149-159.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 DNA packaging motor. Nature 408:745-750.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»