This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundberg, P.
Right arrow Articles by Splitter, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundberg, P.
Right arrow Articles by Splitter, G. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, September 2000, p. 8299-8306, Vol. 74, No. 18
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

gamma delta + T-Lymphocyte Cytotoxicity against Envelope-Expressing Target Cells Is Unique to the Alymphocytic State of Bovine Leukemia Virus Infection in the Natural Host

Patric Lundberg and Gary A. Splitter*

Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin---Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Received 16 March 2000/Accepted 15 June 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is a complex B-lymphotrophic retrovirus of cattle and the causative agent of enzootic bovine leukosis. Serum antibody in infected animals does not correlate with protection from disease, yet only some animals develop severe disease. While a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response may be responsible for directing BLV pathogenesis, this possibility has been left largely unexplored, in part since the lack of readily established cytotoxic target cells in cattle has hampered such studies. Using long-term naturally infected alymphocytic (AL) cattle, we have established the existence of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response against BLV envelope proteins (Env; gp51/gp30). In vitro-expanded peripheral blood mononuclear (PBM) cell effector populations consisted mainly of gamma delta + (>40%), CD4+ (>35%), and CD8+ (>10%) T lymphocytes. Specific lysis of autologous fibroblasts infected with recombinant vaccinia virus (rVV) delivering the BLV env gene ranged from 30 to 65%. Depletion studies indicated that gamma delta + and not CD8+ T cells were responsible for the cytotoxicity against autologous rVVenv-expressing fibroblasts. Additionally, cultured effector cells lysed rVVenv-expressing autologous fibroblasts and rVVenv-expressing xenogeneic targets similarly, suggesting a lack of genetic restricted killing. Restimulation of effector populations increased the proportion of gamma delta + T cells and concomitantly Env-specific cytolysis. Interestingly, culture of cells from BLV-negative or persistently lymphocytic cattle failed to elicit such cytotoxic responses or increase in gamma delta + T-cell numbers. These results imply that cytotoxic gamma delta + T lymphocytes from only AL cattle recognize BLV Env without a requirement for classical major histocompatibility complex interactions. It is known that gamma delta + T lymphocytes are diverse and numerous in cattle, and here we show that they may serve a surveillance role during natural BLV infection.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is among the most widespread livestock pathogens in the United States. A recent comprehensive survey revealed that 89% of dairy operations in the United States, and 41 to 47% of all dairy cattle, are infected with BLV (25). Despite a continued effort to link immune responses against BLV and development of the nonbenign states of enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) (i.e., persistent lymphocytic [PL] state and tumor development), the role of cell-mediated immunity remains enigmatic. Yet, the host must keep the number of BLV-positive (BLV+) cells from accumulating, as two-thirds of infected cattle remain in the benign alymphocytic (AL) state of infection. Due to the protracted pathology of EBL in cattle, most investigations of BLV pathogenesis have been done in sheep. In contrast, we chose to pursue the role of cellular cytotoxicity in the natural host, cattle. Consequently, the extended latency of BLV dictated the use of a cross-sectional study, comparing groups of cattle that had remained in their state of infection for an extended period of time. This study was designed to address whether the state of infection correlated with a specific immune response.

In BLV investigations using sheep, proviral integration and an increase in circulating CD8+ lymphocytes precede seroconversion (60). In the sheep model, identification of specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell epitopes (19) and protection against BLV challenge (38, 39, 42) have been demonstrated after rVVenv inoculation. Furthermore, peptide immunizations have also been shown protective against BLV infection in sheep (24). The picture is less defined in cattle. While several immunization studies in cattle have induced (2, 31) or failed to produce (6, 48) protection, none of these studies addressed the role of cellular cytotoxicity. Also, in cattle, class I and class II BoLA haplotypes show some correlation with state of infection (12, 32, 62, 64). However, an actual effector population of cellular cytotoxicity against components of BLV has not been identified in cattle.

A functional role of gamma delta + T cells in response to pathogens in cattle is still poorly defined. gamma delta + T lymphocytes in ruminants express a diverse repertoire of the T-cell receptor (TcR) (22, 23), and ruminants have an unusually high number of gamma delta + cells in circulation as well as in certain tissues (9). The possible connection between a gamma delta + T-cell response and the ability of most BLV-infected animals to avoid severe disease has not been addressed. gamma delta + T cells have been shown to mount cytotoxic, cytokine, and proliferative responses in several other viral infections. Most relevant to the present study is herpes simplex virus infection, where gamma delta + T cells have been shown to directly recognize the gI protein (51) and also correlate with protection (30, 51, 52). In addition, gamma delta + T cells are notably activated in cytomegalovirus (14), influenza virus (26), and Sendai virus (37) infections and, importantly, in several bovine viral infections such as those caused by bovine respiratory syncytial virus (50), bovine herpesvirus 1 (47), and foot-and-mouth disease virus (3). Activated gamma delta + T cells are also evident during simian and human immunodeficiency virus (SIV and HIV) infections, although their presence does not necessarily correlate with protection (63; reviewed in reference 41), and activated gamma delta + T cells in SIV and HIV infections also react to certain cells lines (17, 57; reviewed in references 8 and 28).

Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is genetically and structurally closely related to BLV. However, the immune responses to these viruses may require separate consideration, as no report links (HTLV-1) and gamma delta + T-cell responses. First, HTLV-1 infects T cells in humans, while BLV infects B cells in cattle. Inherently, the potential for affecting the immune system varies when a different lymphocyte population is the major target for infection. Second, the gamma delta -TcR repertoire in cattle is much greater than in humans (23), allowing for a more diversified gamma delta + T-cell response in cattle.

Here, we test the hypothesis that AL cattle possess lymphocytes capable of lysing cells expressing BLV antigen. The results demonstrate that cytotoxic gamma delta + T lymphocytes of the natural host, cattle, recognize both autologous and xenogeneic target cells expressing BLV env but not irrelevant viral antigen (wild-type vaccinia virus). Additionally, this response is not seen in cattle that are BLV negative (BLV-) or PL, suggesting that these gamma delta + cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are intimately connected to BLV pathogenesis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Classification of BLV- and AL animals. Delineation between infectious states of naturally BLV-infected cattle used previously established criteria (1) of total white blood cell (WBC) counts and agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) analysis. Four BLV-, five BLV+ AL, and five BLV+ PL adult cattle used in this investigation are listed in Table 1. Briefly, BLV- cattle were free of serum antibody to BLV and had no integrated provirus as seen by PCR of the pol gene (4). AL cattle were seropositive and carried BLV provirus. In contrast to AL animals, which had WBC and B-cell counts similar to those of BLV- animals, PL animals had elevated numbers of WBC and circulating B cells. All BLV+ cattle had remained unchanged in status for 5 to 8 years.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Classification of BLV-infected cattlea

Flow cytometry for surface markers. Briefly, mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to bovine surface markers were incubated with 106 cells for 90 min at room temperature. Cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG; heavy plus light chain) for 90 min at room temperature. Cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and analyzed on an EPICS Profile II (Coulter Corp., Miami, Fla.) within 5 days. Antibodies to CD2 (ILA42), CD4 (ILA11), CD8 (ILA51), and IgM (ILA30) (27), from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.), and gamma delta -TcR1 subset (86D) (33), from the European Collection of Animal Cell Culture (Salisbury, United Kingdom), were produced from purchased hybridomas, while the pan-gamma delta -TcR MAb GD3.8 (61) was kindly provided by the laboratory of Mark Jutila (Bozeman, Mont.). Both 86D, which recognizes an external epitope, and GD3.8 gamma delta -specific antibodies immunoprecipitate 38- and 40-kDa peptides, supporting TcR1 specificity. Another CD8 MAb (38-65) from the First International Antibody Workshop (27) was available in our lab. Two-color flow cytometry was performed similarly, with the addition of a 20-min preincubation with Fc Block (PharMingen, San Diego, Calif.) to eliminate interference from Fc receptor expression. Biotinylated MAbs were added at preoptimized concentrations followed by strepavidin-phycoerythrin conjugate. Cells were analyzed the same day or fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde and analyzed within 5 days.

Cell culture of hybridomas, target cell lines, PBM cells, and autologous fibroblast lines. All cells were maintained in complete RPMI 1640 (cRPMI) supplemented with either 5% (cRPMI-5) or 10% (cRPMI-10) fetal calf serum (FBS; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). Before use, each lot of serum was verified free of detectable anti-BLV antibody by the AGID assay. Hybridomas were grown in cRPMI-5. Peripheral blood mononuclear (PBM) cells were isolated and cultured as described below ("Effector cell expansion protocol"). Primary autologous fibroblast cultures used for target cells were established from skin biopsies of each AL and BLV- animal studied and were either used directly or frozen at -70°C in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide in FBS. Briefly, minced skin sections were cultured for 10 to 14 days, and outwardly migrating fibroblasts were collected for an initial expansion of three to four passages, at which point aliquots were frozen in liquid nitrogen to allow for retrieval of early passages. In general, fibroblasts could be passaged more than 30 times before senescence (approximately 100 generations). D17 cells (canine osteosarcoma; obtained from the lab of Howard Temin) were maintained in cRPMI-5.

Recombinant and wild-type vaccinia virus preparation. Wild-type vaccinia virus and recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the BLV env gene (rVVenv) were kindly provided by Misao Onuma (39) and Virogenetics, Inc. (Troy, N.Y.). New viral working stocks were produced by infecting a monolayer of Vero cells with the original virus preparations at a multiplicity of infection of 2 and culturing the cells in cRPMI-10 for 5 days. The infected cells were pelleted for 10 min at 250 × g in a preparative centrifuge, and the pellet was freeze-thawed three times. Prior to use, viral stocks were trypsinized for 30 min at 37°C. Viral titer was determined using a standard plaque assay. Tenfold dilutions of vaccinia virus were added to monolayers of either Vero cells or autologous fibroblasts in cRPMI without FBS for 2 h. An equal volume of cRPMI-10 was then added to each well, and the plates were incubated for 3 to 4 days; then the culture medium was removed, and the cells were stained with 1% crystal violet (Roboz Surgical Instrument Co., Washington, D.C.). Similar PFU for a given virus preparation were observed with Vero cells or autologous fibroblasts (data not shown). Viral stocks were kept at 4°C or frozen at -70°C, depending on length of storage before use.

Effector cell expansion protocol. Heparinized blood was obtained by jugular venipuncture from normal and infected adult Holstein females. PBM cells were isolated over IsoPrep (Robbins Scientific, Bloomington, N.J.) at 1,400 × g for 30 min, washed three times with PBS, resuspended in 25 ml of cRPMI-10, and incubated at 1 × 106 to 2 × 106/ml for 2 h in a 162-cm2 tissue culture flask. Adherent cells were then discarded; nonadherent cells were transferred to a standing 75-cm2 tissue culture flask and incubated for 3 days, after which 25 ml of cRPMI-10 with 50 U of recombinant human interleukin-2 (rhIL-2) per ml was added. Expansion was continued for 7 to 9 days; then viable cells were isolated over IsoPrep and used in cytotoxicity assays. Short-term cell lines were restimulated on a similar culture cycle. Briefly, viable cells were isolated from the expansion culture and combined with autologous irradiated PBM cells (3,500 rad) for 2 to 3 days; then rhIL-2 (25 U/ml; half the concentration used in the initial expansion) was added for another 7 to 9 days. Lines remained viable in sufficient numbers for use in assays for four to six cycles of restimulation. Although IL-12 can elicit gamma delta + T cells, we have shown that macrophages from AL animals produce prostaglandin E2, which can inhibit in vitro expansion of gamma delta + T cells (46).

Cytotoxicity assays. Autologous fibroblasts, uninfected or infected with vaccinia virus vectors (multiplicity of infection of 5) for 12 to 18 h, were trypsinized, rinsed, and labeled with 1 µCi of Na51CrO4 per 2,000 cells in cRPMI for 45 min. As target cells, autologous fibroblasts and D17 cells were >95 and 99% viable (by trypan blue exclusion), respectively, at 36 h of infection (data not shown). Using immunofluorescence, rVVenv-infected cells were approximately 80% positive for vaccinia virus antigen 12 h postinfection (data not shown). After labeling, targets were washed three times with PBS and resuspended in cRPMI-10; then 5,000 cells were added per well in 96-well plates for the assay. Gradient-purified effector cells were added at various effector-to-target (E:T) ratios, with a final volume of 200 µl. Plates were spun for 3 min at 150 × g before and after the 6-h assay. Supernatants were transferred to tubes and counted using a gamma counter.

Depletion of CD8+ and gamma delta + T cells from the effector population. Using MAbs to CD8, CD4, and gamma delta -TcR, specific subpopulations were depleted by complement lysis or two rounds of panning as adapted from previously published protocols (16, 34). Briefly, complement lysis was accomplished by incubating the population with a preoptimized amount of MAb on ice for 1 h in cRPMI. A final volume of 33% rabbit complement (Cedarlane, Hornby, Ontario, Canada) was added, and incubation continued with rotation for 1 h at 37°C; then cell debris was allowed to settle for 5 min on ice. Suspended cells were washed three times in cRPMI and adjusted to desired concentrations in cRPMI-10. Alternatively, plastic culture dishes were coated with MAb diluted in PBS with 1% bovine serum albumin at 4°C overnight and were washed five times with PBS before use. Cells were allowed to adhere to the plate for 1 h at room temperature. Nonadherent cells were transferred to a second plate, and the incubation was repeated. CD8 and CD4 depletions were done by complement lysis (MAb 38-65 [IgG2a] and ILA11 [IgG2a], respectively) and depletions by two rounds of panning (MAb 86D [IgG1]). Following depletions, the remaining cells were washed three times and resuspended to the original volume with cRPMI-10.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

gamma delta + T-lymphocyte expansion from PBM cells is unique to AL animals. Because the majority of BLV-infected cattle remain in the benign AL state of infection, BLV-specific T cells may limit viral infection. To address the hypothesis that antigen-reactive effector cells could be expanded from BLV+ but not BLV- animals, PBM cells were cultured in vitro. T-cell proliferation is composed of two phases, antigen-specific activation resulting in up-regulated IL-2 receptor expression followed by IL-2-dependent expansion of activated cells (5). The distribution of phenotypes of freshly isolated and cultured populations from BLV-, AL, and PL cattle is shown in Table 2. Preexpansion cell populations were similar in both AL and BLV- animals, although AL animals had more CD4+ and CD2+ cells than either BLV- or PL animals. Further analysis of these CD markers was not done. PL cattle showed the symptomatic increase in B cells. However, following the 10- to 12-day expansion in the presence of endogenously expressed BLV and rhIL-2, AL animals had a significantly higher proportion of gamma delta + T lymphocytes than either BLV- (P < 0.001) or PL (P < 0.001) animals, suggesting that activation of T cells by BLV followed by IL-2 expansion of antigen-specific T cells occurs preferentially in the cells from AL animals. The postexpansion cultures from BLV- and PL cattle did not contain statistically different numbers of gamma delta + T cells (P > 0.025). While the relative numbers of CD4+ cells also increased slightly in all groups, the proportion of CD8+ cells in AL animals decreased in contrast to both BLV- (P < 0.001) and PL animals (P < 0.001). Typically, expansion of cells from BLV-free cattle yielded few viable cells, presumably due to the lack of antigen-specific stimulation during the first 3 days of in vitro culture.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Surface phenotypes of PBM cells from BLV-, AL, and PL cattle

In vitro expansion of AL PBM cells yields an Env-reactive cytotoxic population. To examine the function of the expanded cell populations, autologous fibroblasts were used as targets to assess cytotoxic ability. Expression of rVVenv in target cells was confirmed by intracellular immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis using polyclonal anti-vaccinia virus serum and anti-gp51 MAbs, respectively (data not shown). Cytolytic activity against autologous fibroblasts infected with rVVenv but not against wild-type vaccinia virus was detected in expanded populations from AL animals (Fig. 1A). In seven different experiments with five different AL animals and three BLV- animals, the Env-specific lysis by cells from AL animals ranged from 30 to 65%, while cells from uninfected animals failed to lyse the target cells (less than 5%). Despite the expansion of mainly CD8+ T cells from BLV- animals on three occasions (Table 2), those effectors were not able to lyse rVVenv-expressing autologous fibroblasts (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Cytotolysis of rVVenv-expressing autologous fibroblasts by expanded PBM cells from AL animal 17 (A) and BLV- animal 4205 (B). Targets were either infected with rVVenv (triangles) or wild-type vaccinia virus (circles) or uninfected (squares) in a 6-h 51Cr release assay. Spontaneous release was less than 30%, and all determinations were performed in triplicate. The data are representative of seven experiments with three different AL animals and two different BLV- animals. Standard deviations were less than 5% for all data points.

Depletion of gamma delta +, but not CD8+ and CD4+, T lymphocytes reduces Env-specific lysis in AL animals. To determine the T-lymphocyte population responsible for the observed lysis, CD8+ and/or gamma delta + T lymphocytes were depleted in the postexpansion effector populations. A reduction of cytotoxicity resulted when gamma delta + cells were removed (Fig. 2). Treatment with MAb 86D, which recognizes 50 to 70% of gamma delta + T cells in the expanded populations, caused an approximate 50% reduction in lysis of env-expressing target cells, suggesting the involvement of gamma delta + T cells. Depletion of CD8+ T cells or CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, to remove the alpha beta -TcR population and address the role of alpha beta -TcR cells in BLV cytotoxicity, did not alter Env-specific lysis (Fig. 2). Thus, BLV-infected animals in the AL state of infection possess gamma delta + T cells that lyse env-expressing target cells, while BLV- animals did not have detectable cytotoxic gamma delta + T cells.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Cytotolysis of rVVenv-expressing autologous fibroblasts by expanded PBM cell subsets from two AL animals, 17 (A) and 201 (B). The assay was performed as for Fig. 1, at E:T ratios of 50:1 (A) and 30:1 (B). Target cells were either infected with rVVenv (filled) or wild-type vaccinia virus (hatched) or uninfected (clear). Spontaneous release was less than 30%, and all determinations were performed in triplicate. The data are representative of two experiments with two different AL animals. See Materials and Methods for depletion protocols.

Expanded AL effectors are not classically MHC restricted. Previously, NK-like cell lines from cattle (40) were shown to lyse bovine herpesvirus 1-infected D17 cells (a canine osteosarcoma cell line). The vast majority of cells in that study were gamma delta + T cells, which prompted us to test the cytolytic activity of the AL-derived effectors against several common target cell lines. Effectors expanded from AL animals would not kill K562, YAC-1, Daudi, Vero, NMU, or COLO cells (data not shown). However, similar to autologous fibroblasts (Fig. 1), D17 cells were also lysed by AL-derived effector cells when infected with rVVenv (Fig. 3). Minimal lysis of wild-type vaccinia virus-infected and uninfected D17 cells was noted at the highest E:T ratio (<10% specific lysis). The phenotypic distribution of the effector populations used in Fig. 3 are shown in Table 3. The use of D17 cells consequently allows comparison of animals in different states of infection using a single target population, while focusing the examination on major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-nonrestricted cytotoxicity. Thus, as expected, cytolytic gamma delta + T cells from BLV-infected animals in the AL state are not classically MHC restricted. Interestingly, PL animals possess higher numbers of BLV-producing cells in vivo (18), and in vitro demonstration of BLV antigens is much enhanced using cells from PL animals compared to AL animals (15). Therefore, based on BLV antigen availability in culture, gamma delta + T-cell expansion and cytotoxicity should be greater in cells from PL animals. This outcome was not observed in Table 2 and Fig. 3, suggesting only cytotoxic gamma delta + T cells from AL animals recognize BLV Env.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Cytotolysis of rVVenv-expressing D17 cells by short-term cell lines (culture and one restimulation) from AL animal 17 (A), PL animal 2 (B), and BLV- animal 602 (C). Targets were either uninfected (squares) or infected with wild-type vaccinia virus (circles) or rVVenv (triangles) and used in a 6-h 51Cr release assay. Spontaneous release was less than 30%, and all determinations were performed in triplicate. The data are representative of two experiments with two different AL animals, two different BLV- animals, and three different PL animals. Standard deviations were less than 5% for all data points.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Phenotypes of short-term cell linesa

Restimulated AL cell lines retain their ability to lyse rVVenv-expressing targets. Since culture of PBM cells from AL animals evoked a cytotoxic effector population, the cultured cells were restimulated to assess continued antigen specificity and enrichment for cytotoxicity. Indeed, Fig. 4 shows that short-term cell lines were capable of substantial (50 to 100%) lysis after three to four rounds of restimulation. Although individual cultures varied in their relative lysis of rVVenv and wild-type vaccinia virus-infected targets, specific cytotoxicity remained high with continued in vitro culture (Fig. 4).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Env-specific lysis of rVVenv-infected D17 cells by short-term T-cell lines from animal 201. Lines were restimulated three to four times with irradiated PBM cells and 25 U of rhIL-2 per ml after initial expansion culture (-nx). Independently derived 3-week cultures are given the letters A, B, and C. D17 cells were infected with either rVVenv (solid) or wild-type vaccinia virus (hatched). Spontaneous release was less than 35%, and determinations were done in triplicate at an E:T ratio of 20:1. The data are representative of two restimulation experiments for this animal.

Cell lines from AL animals are unique in their lysis of rVVenv-expressing targets. To test whether in vitro restimulation results in cytotoxic gamma delta + T cells regardless of state of infection, cell lines from animals in all three categories were tested for cytotoxic ability. Figure 5 shows that restimulated AL-derived cell lines lysed rVVenv-expressing D17 cells, while cell lines from BLV- and PL animals did not (Fig. 5). Cells from one AL animal (animal 4) rarely lysed rVVenv-expressing targets after initial PBM cell expansion. However, following repeated restimulation, cells from this AL animal also showed high env-specific lysis (Fig. 6). Therefore, cattle in the AL state of infection possess cells capable of lysing cells that express a BLV antigen; in contrast, animals in the PL state of infection, as well as uninfected animals, do not have cytotoxic cells specific for BLV antigens.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   rVVenv-specific lysis of D17 target cells by restimulated lines from AL but not from BLV- or PL animals. Lines were restimulated one to four times with irradiated PBM cells and 25 U of rhIL-2 per ml after initial expansion culture. D17 cells were infected with either rVVenv (solid) or wild-type vaccinia virus (hatched). Two BLV- (A, 920-3x; B, 920-2x), seven AL (C, 4-4x; D, 17-4x; E, 17-3x; F, 17-2x; G, 201-2x; H, 201-1x; I, 234-1x), and seven PL (J, 019-3x; K, 019-2x; L, 019-1x; M, 2-3x; N, 2-1x; O, 191-3x; P, 191-1x) cell lines were used. The cell lines are representative of a larger pool tested, and sequential numbers do not necessarily refer to a continuous restimulation culture. Spontaneous release was less than 30%, and determinations were done in triplicate at an E:T ratio of 30:1. The data are representative of two restimulation experiments.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.   rVVenv-specific lysis of D17 target cells by restimulated lines from AL animal 4 despite insignificant lysis after first culture. Effector populations were either cultured once from PBM cells (cultured) or subsequently restimulated two (4-2x) or four (4-4x) times with irradiated PBM cells and 25 U of rhIL-2 per ml after initial culture. D17 cells were infected with either rVVenv (solid) or wild-type vaccinia virus (hatched). Spontaneous release was less than 25%, and determinations were done in triplicate at an E:T ratio of 20:1.

gamma delta + T cells in restimulated AL cell lines increase in relative number and correlate with cytotoxicity. Because others have observed an increase in CD2- gamma delta + T cells in BLV+ cattle (54), and the expanded gamma delta + cells from AL animals may be CD2- (Table 2), we determined if cells of this phenotype from AL animals were expanded. The phenotypes of cell lines restimulated one to five times (Table 4) were compared for their cytotoxic potential (Fig. 7A). Increasing numbers of gamma delta + T cells correlated with the level of cytotoxicity. Conversely, the number of CD8+ T cells declined more than 6-fold (Table 4), while env cytotoxicity increased nearly 10-fold (Fig. 7A). Additionally, when we determined the coexpression of CD2 and the gamma delta -TcR, a correlation between increased cytotoxicity and the number of gamma delta + T cells that were CD2- was equally striking (Fig. 7B), suggesting the phenotype of the cytotoxic cell is gamma delta + CD2-. Similar findings between CD2- gamma delta + T cells and increasing cytotoxicity were evident for long-term-cultured cell lines from two other AL animals. The findings from this experiment further support the role of gamma delta + T cells from the AL state of infection are responsible for in vitro lysis of cells expressing a BLV antigen.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   Phenotypes of multiple restimulated cell linesa



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.   Cytotoxic activity against rVVenv-infected D17 cells correlated with CD2- gamma delta + T cells in cell lines. Short-term cell lines from animal 17 (17-1x, 17-2x, 17-3x, and 17-4x) were restimulated with irradiated PBM cells one, two, three, and four times, respectively. For flow cytometry data on these lines, see Table 4. These are the aggregate data on sequential restimulations of the same culture. (A) Increase in cytolytic activity against rVVenv-infected (filled) but not wild-type vaccinia virus-infected (hatched) D17 cells with each restimulation. Spontaneous release was less than 30%, and determinations were done in triplicate at an E:T ratio of 20:1. (B) Increase in percent CD2- gamma delta + T cells of total gamma delta + T cells with each restimulation.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

BLV is among the most persistent pathogens in cattle, whose immune system, like that of all ruminants, is unique in its gamma delta + T-cell prevalence and diversity. Despite these two distinct phenomena, the relevance of gamma delta + T cells to BLV pathogenesis has not been thoroughly explored. To address this lack of understanding, we determined if gamma delta + T cells from BLV-infected animals could recognize cells expressing components of BLV. A large proportion of the expanded effector cell population from adult AL animals were gamma delta -TcR positive. These gamma delta + T cells were cytotoxic to rVVenv-expressing target cells. In contrast to the AL animals, PBM cells from BLV- animals typically failed to survive in parallel cultures. Only approximately 1/10 of the number of the cells survived in 3 of 8 attempted BLV- cultures, compared to the constant recovery of cells from each of 10 AL and 10 PL cultures (Table 2). Furthermore, cultures from PL animals contained approximately equal numbers of B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells, all being threefold more prevalent than gamma delta + T cells, and these PL-derived effectors failed to lyse rVVenv-expressing target cells.

The role of gamma delta + T cells in ruminants may extend beyond the proposed role of complementing gamma delta + T cells suggested for primates (58). The prominence of gamma delta + T cells in our in vitro studies and the high proficiency of BLV-specific CTL activity suggests that gamma delta + CTL play a significant role in controlling BLV infection in the AL state. The lack of this reactive gamma delta + CTL population in PL animals implies that gamma delta + T cells are intimately connected to BLV pathogenesis. To our knowledge, this is the first time that gamma delta + T cells have been shown to respond specifically to retroviral proteins in ruminants.

Depletion of CD8+, CD4+, and gamma delta + cells indicated that gamma delta + cells expanded from AL animals were largely responsible for the target cell lysis. Additionally, the cytotoxicity to Env was not MHC restricted, as evidenced by the lysis of rVVenv-infected D17 cells (Fig. 3). However, expanded PBM cells from AL cattle typically showed no significant cytotoxicity against noninfected and wild-type vaccinia virus-infected autologous target cells, indicating that the cytotoxicity was not the result of NK cells. Cultured cells from AL animals also contained a large proportion of CD4+ T lymphocytes, while CD8+ T lymphocytes comprised less than a third of the gamma delta + T-lymphocyte population. While the 10 to 20% CD8+ T lymphocytes may be responsible for the high levels of cytotoxicity observed, depletion of CD8+ effector cells did not alter cytotoxicity (Fig. 2), and reduction in CD8+ cells occurred while cytotoxicity increased in the short-term cell lines (Table 4 and Fig. 7). Also, the substantially higher levels of CD8+ T cells in BLV- and PL cattle following culture was not accompanied by increased cytotoxicity (Fig. 3, Fig. 5, and data not shown). The relatively large proportion (>35%) of CD4+ T lymphocytes in expanded cultures from AL animals would be additional candidates for cytotoxic effector cells. However, CD4+ CTLs are MHC class II restricted (reviewed in reference 21), while autologous fibroblast targets are MHC class II negative and D17 cells are xenogeneic to cattle. Recently, gamma delta + T cells were reported to present antigen and stimulate CD4+ cells (10). This possiblity would explain the continued presence of CD4+ cells in our cultures (Tables 2 to 4). Alternatively, there may be a reciprocal relationship between CD4+ and gamma delta + cells that is required for gamma delta + cell expansion and/or cytotoxicity. Also, CD4+ cells may be stimulated nonspecifically in culture through the presence of endogenous IL-2 or other cytokines. Although investigation regarding the continued CD4+ T-cell presence in culture was beyond the scope of this study, depletion of CD4+ T cells did not affect cytotoxicity in our system (Fig. 2); moreover, despite large proportions (26 to 61%) of CD4+ cells in cell lines from BLV- and PL animals, these effector populations were not cytotoxic (Table 3, Fig. 3, and data not shown).

Since CD4+ and CD8+ cells are primarily CD2+, the single surface marker staining in Table 2 suggests that cultured cells from AL animals increase in gamma delta + cells but not in CD2+ cells. Additionally, CD2- gamma delta + cells increase in BLV+ cattle (54), and we show here that loss of CD2 expression on gamma delta + T cells correlated with restimulation of effector cells concomitantly with increased cytotoxicity (Table 4 and Fig. 7). However, decreasing CD2+ cells over time may be a consequence of CD2-mediated apoptosis (55). Future experiments should address the relevance of this gamma delta + subpopulation in the rVVenv-specific cytotoxic response. In all cytotoxicity assays, the relative numbers of gamma delta cell subsets, TcR-N3, TcR-N4, TcR-N6, TcR-N7, TcR-N12 (13), and 86D, were determined, but none of these populations demonstrated a correlation with BLV infection status or cytotoxicity in cultured cell populations (data not shown). The exclusive role for gamma delta + CTLs is corroborated by the lysis of D17 targets expressing BLV proteins, where a conventional coreceptor model cannot explain the data. While an apparent lack of MHC restriction was observed, nonclassical presentation molecules (such as CD1) cannot be excluded. However, recognition of nonclassical MHC molecules by bovine gamma delta +-TcR has not been shown to date and may be an unlikely explanation.

Occasionally, AL animals in this study had slightly elevated levels of circulating gamma delta + cells relative to noninfected control animals, but the increase was not statistically significant (Table 2). However, the BLV- animals used in this study had a slightly higher number of circulating gamma delta + cells than previously reported (18), possibly due to the lack of a specific pan-gamma delta -TcR MAb in the earlier study.

Considering that BLV mRNA can be detected ex vivo in sheep (43), the immune system of infected cattle may encounter BLV antigen with relative frequency despite the extended latency of BLV in cattle. Indeed, individual cells of cattle have been shown to express BLV mRNA in vivo (20). In the sheep model, periodic appearance of Rex-specific antibodies and sustained antibodies against other BLV components was detected (43), implying opportunity for repeated contact with BLV antigen and repeated stimulation of BLV-specific gamma delta + T cells. Although disease development in cattle is not precisely mimicked by sheep, infected cattle similarly remain seropositive and proviral DNA can be found throughout life. Furthermore, endogenous BLV antigen is produced by B cells from cattle during in vitro culture (references 1, 15, and 29 and data not shown), providing a source of BLV antigen for gamma delta + T cells.

In HIV, Vgamma 9/Vdelta 2 T-cell responses to HIV-infected targets exist in both uninfected and infected individuals (59), but these cells are diverse in the complementarity-determining region 3 of the TcR and also recognize other virus-infected cells. We have no evidence that the gamma delta + T cells identified in this study are similarly limited in gamma delta chain expression, but they recognize neither wild-type vaccinia virus-infected targets nor any of several common cell lines in our cytotoxicity assay. In HIV-negative humans, Vgamma 9/Vdelta 2+ T cells recognize HIV- or SIV-infected cells and Daudi cells without a requirement for prior activation (7; reviewed in reference 57), suggesting that antigen-specific stimulation may not be necessary for antiretroviral activity. Additionally, Vgamma 9/Vdelta 2+ T cells from HIV-positive individuals are functionally defective in the ability to respond to stimulation by Daudi cells and ethyl pyrophosphate (59). Similarly, in SIV, gamma delta + CTLs respond to infected target cells and Daudi cells (17, 56). The extent to which the gamma delta + T cells in HIV- or SIV-positive primates parallel the PBM cells from BLV+ cattle remains to be determined. Additionally, gamma delta + CTLs have not been identified in individuals infected with HTLV-1, and the bovine gamma delta + CTLs in the present study were unique to AL animals and were not reactive to Daudi cells.

Often, CTL studies use a specific antigen derived from the pathogen of interest, many times in the form of peptide-pulsed antigen-presenting cells (APC). By necessity, peptide-pulsing studies select for a CTL population capable of engaging APC surface molecules carrying the administered peptide antigen. In contrast, the present study relied on endogenous BLV as a source of antigen, followed by expansion of antigen-responsive T lymphocytes in culture. Consequently, the antigen presentation pathway is determined by natural viral expression during effector stimulation. The presence of BLV antigen and reverse transcriptase activity in culture supernatants from BLV-infected animals in this study was confirmed but not quantified (data not shown). Addition of rhIL-2 at the start of the in vitro culture or omission of rhIL-2 during the 7- to 9-day expansion phase resulted in high nonspecific or no cytotoxicity, respectively (data not shown). The use of endogenous BLV as the antigen may more accurately represent the role that BLV plays in vivo. The minimal manipulation of the cultured PBM cells more likely representative than peptide-pulsed APC stimulation in modeling what occurs as the integrated BLV provirus breaks latency.

Aside from antigen availability during culture, correlation of the AL and PL states of infection with BoLA haplotypes (12, 32, 62, 64) and cytokine profiles (36, 44-46, 54) suggests that immune responses from BLV+ animals are linked to cytokine production. All PBM cell cultures from BLV+ animals produce IL-10 over time (D. Pyeon, personal communication), and macrophages from PL cattle also secrete significant amounts of IL-10 ex vivo (45) whereas macrophages from AL animals secrete IL-12 (44). The combination of IL-2 and IL-12 has been found to elicit highly reactive human gamma delta + CTLs (49). Additionally, IL-12 and IL-1 are necessary for the development and activation of gamma delta + responses (53). We know from our previous work (reference 11 and data not shown) that large quantities of IL-1 are present at early stages of in vitro culture. Consequently, the choice between IL-10 and IL-12 production and/or secretion may help determine, or result from, the infection state of EBL. Similarly, reactivity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (35) and HIV (7) by gamma delta + T cells is enhanced by IL-12 and abrogated by IL-10 (35). Interestingly, the PBM cells from the less gamma delta + T-cell-reactive AL animal 4 contained higher baseline levels of IL-10 mRNA ex vivo than the more reactive AL animals (Pyeon, personal communication). As shown in Fig. 6, restimulation of PBM cells from this animal and removal of macrophages as the source of IL-10 in vitro (45) overcame an initial lack of a gamma delta + T-cell response, indicating that unresponsiveness was not permanent. However, under identical culture conditions, cells from PL animals did not possess rVVenv-specific cytotoxicity (Fig. 5). In conclusion, this study shows that AL cattle, but not PL cattle, are capable of eliciting Env-specific gamma delta + CTLs. These CTLs are not MHC restricted and may recognize the BLV protein directly. Defining the role of this unique cell population from AL animals could be crucial to understanding the pathology of EBL.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Virogenetics, Inc., and Misao Onuma for providing samples of recombinant vaccinia virus. Thanks go to Oto Orlik for providing expert advice as well as anti-BLV MAbs, to Jerome Harms, David Pauza, and Paul Lambert for helpful discussions, and to Cathryn Lundberg for assistance with the immunofluorescence. We are also grateful for the generous supply of GD3.8 antibody from Mark Jutila.

This work was supported by National Cancer Institute grant ROI CA59127, BARD 95-34339-2556, and the University of Wisconsin College of Agricultural and Life Sciences.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin---Madison, 1655 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706. Phone: (608) 262-1837. Fax: (608) 262-7420. E-mail: gas{at}ahabs.wisc.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Adomaitiene, D., V. Tamosiunas, M. Mauricas, V. Surovas, and A. Markevicius. 1983. Establishment of a cell line from leucocytes of a cow with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 4:565-577[CrossRef][Medline].
2. Altaner, C., J. Ban, V. Altanerova, and V. Janik. 1991. Protective vaccination against bovine leukaemia virus infection by means of cell-derived vaccine. Vaccine 9:889-895[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Amadori, M., I. L. Archetti, R. Verardi, and C. Berneri. 1995. Role of a distinct population of bovine T cells in the immune response to viral agents. Viral Immunol. 8:81-91[Medline].
4. Boris-Lawrie, K., V. Altanerova, C. Altaner, L. Kucerova, and H. Temin. 1997. In vivo study of genetically simplified bovine leukemia virus derivatives that lack tax and rex. J. Virol. 71:1514-1520[Abstract].
5. Chain, B., I. McCafferty, G. McCafferty, G. Wallace, and P. W. Askenase. 1987. Improvement of the in vitro T cell proliferation assay by a modified method that separates the antigen recognition and IL-2-dependent steps. J. Immunol. Methods 99:221-228[CrossRef][Medline].
6. Cherney, T. M., and R. D. Schultz. 1996. Viral status and antibody response in cattle inoculated with recombinant bovine leukemia virus-vaccinia virus vaccines after challenge exposure with bovine leukemia virus-infected lymphocytes. Am. J. Vet. Res. 57:812-818[Medline].
7. Chervenak, K. A., M. M. Lederman, and W. H. Boom. 1997. Bacterial antigen activation of Vdelta +1 and Vdelta +2 gamma delta T cells of persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Infect. Dis. 175:429-433[Medline].
8. Chien, Y. H., R. Jores, and M. P. Crowley. 1996. Recognition by gamma /delta + T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:511-532[CrossRef][Medline].
9. Ciccarese, S., C. Lanave, and C. Saccone. 1997. Evolution of T-cell receptor gamma and delta constant region and other T-cell-related proteins in the human-rodent-artiodactyl triplet. Genetics 145:409-419[Abstract].
10. Collins, R. A., D. Werling, S. E. Duggan, A. P. Bland, K. R. Parsons, and C. J. Howard. 1998. gamma delta + T cells present antigen to CD4+ alpha beta T cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 63:707-714[Abstract].
11. Covert, J., and G. Splitter. 1995. Detection of cytokine transcriptional profiles from bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells and CD4+ lymphocytes by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 49:39-50[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Da, Y., R. D. Shanks, J. A. Stewart, and H. A. Lewin. 1993. Milk and fat yields decline in bovine leukemia virus-infected dairy cattle with persistent lymphocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:6538-6541[CrossRef].
13. Davis, W. C., W. C. Brown, M. J. Hamilton, C. R. Wyatt, J. A. Orden, A. M. Khalid, and J. Naessens. 1996. Analysis of monoclonal antibodies specific for the gamma delta TcR. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 52:275-283[CrossRef][Medline].
14. Dechanet, J., P. Merville, A. Lim, C. Retiere, V. Pitard, X. Lafarge, S. Michelson, C. Meric, M. M. Hallet, P. Kourilsky, L. Potaux, M. Bonneville, and J. F. Moreau. 1999. Implication of gamma delta T cells in the human immune response to cytomegalovirus. J. Clin. Investig. 103:1437-1449[Medline].
15. Driscoll, D. M., and C. Olson. 1977. Bovine leukemia virus-associated antigens in lymphocyte cultures. Am. J. Vet. Res. 38:1897-1898[Medline].
16. Falkoff, R. M., M. Peters, and A. S. Fauci. 1982. T cell enrichment and depletion of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell preparations. Unexpected findings in the study of the separated populations. J. Immunol. Methods 50:39-49[CrossRef][Medline].
17. Gan, Y. H., and M. Malkovsky. 1996. Mechanisms of simian gamma delta T cell cytotoxicity against tumor and immunodeficiency virus-infected cells. Immunol. Lett. 49:191-196[CrossRef][Medline].
18. Gatei, M. H., R. B. Brandon, H. M. Naif, M. W. McLennan, R. C. Daniel, and M. F. Lavin. 1989. Changes in B cell and T cell subsets in bovine leukaemia virus-infected cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 23:139-147[CrossRef][Medline].
19. Gatei, M. H., M. F. Good, R. C. Daniel, and M. F. Lavin. 1993. T-cell responses to highly conserved CD4 and CD8 epitopes on the outer membrane protein of bovine leukemia virus: relevance to vaccine development. J. Virol. 67:1796-1802[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Gaynor, E. M., M. L. Mirsky, and H. A. Lewin. 1996. Use of flow cytometry and RT-PCR for detecting gene expression by single cells. BioTechniques 21:286-291[Medline].
21. Hahn, S., R. Gehri, and P. Erb. 1995. Mechanism and biological significance of CD4-mediated cytotoxicity. Immunol. Rev. 146:57-79[CrossRef][Medline].
22. Hein, W. R., and L. Dudler. 1993. Divergent evolution of T cell repertoires: extensive diversity and developmentally regulated expression of the sheep gamma delta T cell receptor. EMBO J. 12:715-724[Medline].
23. Hein, W. R., and L. Dudler. 1997. TcR gamma delta+ cells are prominent in normal bovine skin and express a diverse repertoire of antigen receptors. Immunology 91:58-64[CrossRef][Medline].
24. Hislop, A. D., M. F. Good, L. Mateo, J. Gardner, M. H. Gatei, R. C. Daniel, B. V. Meyers, M. F. Lavin, and A. Suhrbier. 1998. Vaccine-induced cytotoxic T lymphocytes protect against retroviral challenge. Nat. Med. 4:1193-1196[CrossRef][Medline].
25. Hopkins, S. G., and R. F. DiGiacomo. 1997. Natural transmission of bovine leukemia virus in dairy and beef cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 13:107-128[Medline].
26. Hoq, M. M., T. Suzitani, T. Toyoda, G. Horiike, I. Yoshida, and M. Azuma. 1997. Role of gamma delta TcR+ lymphocytes in the augmented resistance of trehalose 6,6'-dimycolate-treated mice to influenza virus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 78:1597-1603[Abstract].
27. Howard, C. J., W. I. Morrison, W. R. Hein, C. R. MacKay, and G. A. Splitter. 1991. Leukocyte antigens in cattle, sheep and goats. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 27:1-276[CrossRef][Medline].
28. Kaufmann, S. H. 1996. gamma delta and other unconventional T lymphocytes: what do they see and what do they do? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:2272-2279[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Kerkhofs, P., E. Adam, L. Droogmans, D. Portetelle, M. Mammerickx, A. Burny, R. Kettman, and L. Willems. 1996. Cellular pathways involved in the ex vivo expression of bovine leukemia virus. J. Virol. 70:2170-2177[Abstract].
30. Kodukula, P., T. Liu, N. V. Rooijen, M. J. Jager, and R. L. Hendricks. 1999. Macrophage control of herpes simplex virus type 1 replication in the peripheral nervous system. J. Immunol. 162:2895-2905[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Kukaine, R. A., L. I. Nagayeva, S. V. Chapenko, T. N. Iljinskaya, O. I. Bratsslvskaya, L. A. Vitolin, I. K. Yanchev, S. Bozhkov, I. I. Alexandrov, R. N. Stefanova, I. S. Florova, B. Parvoulov, M. I. Mateev, and N. Z. Sotirov. 1993. Protection against bovine leukemia virus infection in two breeds of cattle. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16:63-71[CrossRef][Medline].
32. Lewin, H. A., M. C. Wu, J. A. Stewart, and T. J. Nolan. 1988. Association between BoLA and subclinical bovine leukemia virus infection in a herd of Holstein-Friesian cows. Immunogenetics 27:338-344[CrossRef][Medline].
33. Mackay, C. R., M.-F. Beya, and P. Matzinger. 1989. T cells express a unique surface molecule appearing late during thymic development. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:1477-1488[Medline].
34. Mage, M. G. 1994. Fractionation of T cells and B cells, p. 3.5.1-3.5.6. In R. Coico (ed.), Current protocols in immunology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
35. Marx, S., D. Wesch, and D. Kabelitz. 1997. Activation of human gamma delta T cells by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Daudi lymphoma cells: differential regulatory effect of IL-10 and IL-12. J. Immunol. 158:2842-2848[Abstract].
36. Meirom, R., S. Moss, J. Brenner, D. Heller, and Z. Trainin. 1997. Levels and role of cytokines in bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection. Leukemia 11(Suppl. 3):219-220.
37. Ogasawara, T., M. Emoto, K. Kiyotani, K. Shimokata, T. Yoshida, Y. Nagai, and Y. Yoshikai. 1994. Sendai virus pneumonia: evidence for the early recruitment of gamma delta T cells during the disease course. J. Virol. 68:4022-4027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38. Ohishi, K., H. Suzuki, T. Yamamoto, T. Maruyama, K. Miki, Y. Ikawa, S. Numakunai, K. Okada, K.-I. Ohshima, and M. Sugimoto. 1991. Protective immunity against bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) induced in carrier sheep by inoculation with a vaccinia virus-BLV env recombinant: association with cell-mediated immunity. J. Gen. Virol. 72:1887-1892[Abstract/Free Full Text].
39. Onuma, M., T. Hodatsu, S. Yamamoto, M. Higashihara, S. Masu, T. Mikami, and H. Izawa. 1984. Protection by vaccination against bovine leukemia virus infection in sheep. Am. J. Vet. Res. 45:1212-1215[Medline].
40. Palmer, L., T. Leary, K. Wilson, and G. Splitter. 1990. Bovine natural killer-like cell responses against cell lines expressing recombinant bovine herpesvirus type 1 glycoproteins. J. Immunol. 145:1009-1014[Abstract].
41. Poccia, F., M. Wallace, V. Colizzi, and M. Malkovsky. 1998. Possible protective and pathogenic roles of gamma delta T lymphocytes in HIV-infections. Int. J. Mol. Med. 1:409-413[Medline].
42. Portetelle, D., K. Limbach, A. Burny, M. Mammerickx, P. Desmettre, M. Riviere, J. Zavada, and E. Paoletti. 1991. Recombinant vaccinia virus expression of the bovine leukaemia virus envelope gene and protection of immunized sheep against infection. Vaccine 9:194-200[CrossRef][Medline].
43. Powers, M. A., D. Grossman, L. C. Kidd, and K. Radke. 1991. Episodic occurrence of antibodies against the bovine leukemia virus Rex protein during the course of infection in sheep. J. Virol. 65:4959-4965[Abstract/Free Full Text].
44. Pyeon, D., and G. A. Splitter. 1998. Interleukin-12 p40 mRNA expression in bovine leukemia virus-infected animals: increased in alymphocytosis but decreased in persistent lymphocytosis. J. Virol. 72:6917-6921[Abstract/Free Full Text].
45. Pyeon, D., K. L. O'Reilly, and G. A. Splitter. 1996. Increased interleukin-10 mRNA expression in tumor-bearing or persistently lymphocytotic animals infected with bovine leukemia virus. J. Virol. 70:5706-5710[Abstract/Free Full Text].
46. Pyeon, D., F. J. Diaz, and G. A. Splitter. 2000. Prostaglandin E2 increases bovine leukemia virus tax and pol mRNA via cyclooxygenase-2: regulation by interleukin-1, interleukin-10, and bovine leukemia virus. J. Virol. 74:5740-5745[Abstract/Free Full Text].
47. Quade, M. J., and J. A. Roth. 1999. Antigen-specific in vitro activation of T-lymphocyte subsets of cattle immunized with a modified live bovine herpesvirus 1 vaccine. Viral Immunol. 12:9-21[Medline].
48. Ristau, E., W. Wittman, E. Starick, and K. H. Kluge. 1989. Bovine leucosis virus challenge infection of calves following application of BL-3 cells. Arch. Exp. Veterinaermed. 43:155-158[Medline].
49. Satoh, M., S. Seki, W. Hashimoto, K. Ogasawara, T. Kobayashi, K. Kumagai, S. Matsuno, and K. Takeda. 1996. Cytotoxic prostaglandin gamma delta - or alpha beta -T cells with a natural killer cell marker, CD56, induced from human peripheral blood lymphocytes by a combination of IL-12 and IL-2. J. Immunol. 157:3886-3892[Abstract].
50. Schrijver, R. S., J. P. Langedijk, G. M. Keil, W. G. Middel, M. Maris-Veldhuis, J. T. Van Oirschot, and F. A. Rijsewijk. 1997. Immunization of cattle with a BHV1 vector vaccine or a DNA vaccine both coding for the G protein of BRSV. Vaccine 15:1908-1916[CrossRef][Medline].
51. Sciammas, R., and J. A. Bluestone. 1998. HSV-1 glycoprotein I-reactive TcR gamma delta cells directly recognize the peptide backbone in a conformationally dependent manner. J. Immunol. 161:5187-5192[Abstract/Free Full Text].
52. Sciammas, R., P. Kodukula, Q. Tang, R. L. Hendricks, and J. A. Bluestone. 1997. T cell receptor-gamma delta cells protect mice from herpes simplex virus type 1-induced lethal encephalitis. J. Exp. Med. 185:1969-1975[Abstract/Free Full Text].
53. Skeen, M. J., and H. K. Ziegler. 1995. Activation of gamma delta T cells for production of IFN-gamma is mediated by bacteria via macrophage-derived cytokines IL-1 and IL-12. J. Immunol. 154:5832-5841[Abstract].
54. Sordillo, L. M., C. R. Hicks, and G. M. Pighetti. 1994. Altered interleukin-2 production by lymphocyte populations from bovine leukemia virus-infected cattle. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 207:268-273[CrossRef][Medline].
55. Spinozzi, F., I. Nicoletti, E. Agea, S. Belia, R. Moraca, G. Migliorati, C. Riccardi, F. Grignani, and A. Bertotto. 1995. IL-4 is able to reverse the CD2-mediated negative apoptotic signal to CD4-CD8- alpha beta and/or gamma delta T lymphocytes. Immunology 86:379-384[Medline].
56. Wallace, M., Y. H. Gan, C. D. Pauza, and M. Malkovsky. 1994. Antiviral activity of primate gamma delta T lymphocytes isolated by magnetic cell sorting. J. Med. Primatol. 23:131-135[Medline].
57. Wallace, M., M. Malkovsky, and S. R. Carding. 1995. Gamma/delta T lymphocytes in viral infections. J. Leukoc. Biol. 58:277-283[Abstract].
58. Wallace, M., S. R. Bartz, W. L. Chang, D. A. Mackenzie, C. D. Pauza, and M. Malkovsky. 1996. Gamma delta T lymphocyte responses to HIV. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 103:177-184[CrossRef][Medline].
59. Wallace, M., A. M. Scharko, C. D. Pauza, P. Fisch, K. Imaoka, S. Kawabata, K. Fujihashi, H. Kiyono, Y. Tanaka, B. R. Bloom, and M. Malkovsky. 1997. Functional gamma delta T-lymphocyte defect associated with human immunodeficiency virus infections. Mol. Med. 3:60-71[Medline].
60. Ward, W. H., C. K. Dimmock, and F. W. Eaves. 1992. T lymphocyte responses of sheep to bovine leukaemia virus infection. Immunol. Cell Biol. 70:329-336.
61. Wilson, E., B. Walcheck, W. C. Davis, and M. A. Jutila. 1998. Preferential tissue localization of gamma delta T cell subsets defined by anti-T cell receptor antibodies. Immunol. Lett. 64:39-44[CrossRef][Medline].
62. Xu, A., M. J. T. Van Eijk, C. Park, and H. A. Lewin. 1993. Polymorphism of BoLA-DRB3 exon 2 correlates with resistance and susceptibility to persistent lymphocytosis caused by bovine leukemia virus. J. Immunol. 151:6977-6986[Abstract].
63. Yin, C., M. S. Wu, C. D. Pauza, and M. S. Salvato. 1999. High major histocompatibility complex-unrestricted lysis of simian immunodeficiency virus envelope-expressing cells predispose macaques to rapid AIDS progression. J. Virol. 73:3692-3701[Abstract/Free Full Text].
64. Zanotti, M., G. Poli, W. Ponti, M. Polli, M. Rocchi, E. Bolzani, M. Longeri, S. Russo, H. A. Lewin, and M. J. van Eijk. 1996. Association of BoLA class II haplotypes with subclinical progression of bovine leukaemia virus infection in Holstein-Friesian cattle. Anim. Genet. 27:337-341[Medline].


Journal of Virology, September 2000, p. 8299-8306, Vol. 74, No. 18
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Fulton, B. E. Jr., Portella, M., Radke, K. (2006). Dissemination of bovine leukemia virus-infected cells from a newly infected sheep lymph node.. J. Virol. 80: 7873-7884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundberg, P.
Right arrow Articles by Splitter, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundberg, P.
Right arrow Articles by Splitter, G. A.