This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: JVI.01319-08v1 82/20/10271    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Google Scholar Articles by Bibollet-Ruche, F. Articles by Kutsch, O. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bibollet-Ruche, F. Articles by Kutsch, O.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, October 2008, p. 10271-10278, Vol. 82, No. 20
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.01319-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The Quality of Chimpanzee T-Cell Activation and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Susceptibility Achieved via Antibody-Mediated T-Cell Receptor/CD3 Stimulation Is a Function of the Anti-CD3 Antibody Isotype

Departments of Medicine,¹ Genetics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama,² Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia³

Received 24 June 2008/ Accepted 24 July 2008

While human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is associated with hyperimmune activation and systemic depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection in sooty mangabeys or chimpanzees does not exhibit these hallmarks. Control of immune activation is thought to be one of the major components that govern species-dependent differences in the disease pathogenesis. A previous study introduced the idea that the resistance of chimpanzees to SIVcpz infection-induced hyperimmune activation could be the result of the expression of select sialic acid-recognizing immunoglobulin (Ig)-like lectin (Siglec) superfamily members by chimpanzee T cells. Siglecs, which are absent on human T cells, were thought to control levels of T-cell activation in chimpanzees and were thus suggested as a cause for the pathogenic differences in the course of SIVcpz or HIV-1 infection. As in human models of T-cell activation, stimulation had been attempted using an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (MAb) (UCHT1; isotype IgG1), but despite efficient binding, UCHT1 failed to activate chimpanzee T cells, an activation block that could be partially overcome by MAb-induced Siglec-5 internalization. We herein demonstrate that anti-CD3 MAb-mediated chimpanzee T-cell activation is a function of the anti-CD3 MAb isotype and is not governed by Siglec expression. While IgG1 anti-CD3 MAbs fail to stimulate chimpanzee T cells, IgG2a anti-CD3 MAbs activate chimpanzee T cells in the absence of Siglec manipulations. Our results thus imply that prior to studying possible differences between human and chimpanzee T-cell activation, a relevant model of chimpanzee T cell activation needs to be established.

Published ahead of print on 30 July 2008.